[WATCH] Plot Twist: George Floyd’s Drug Dealer Just Made a Jaw-Dropping Statement In Court

In the Groege Floyd courtroom, things are starting to heat up.
Today was a huge day for a lot of reasons.
It’s worth noting that a police trainer testified that Officer Chauvn’s restraint of Mr. Floyd was not a “neck restraint.”
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
Here’s what a BBC reporter said on Twitter: “#ChauvinTrial Sgt Mercil asked if he could see Chauvin’s head placement? Yes, indeed. In photo 1046, can you see Mr Chauvin’s knee between Mr Floyd’s shoulder blades? Sir, indeed. Is it true that this is a neck restraint? “Sir, no.”
The prosecution seems to be arguing that the restraint was a “shoulder” restraint rather than a “neck restraint.”
As a result, the “cause of death” will be called into question.
And that brings us to the day’s biggest surprise: the man who was in Floyd’s car (dubbed his “drug dealer” by Floyd’s girlfriend) declined to testify in court, pleading the 5th, because he is afraid of being convicted in Floyd’s case.
#ChauvinTrial Sgt Mercil asked if he can see the placement of Chauvin's head? Yes. Another photo 1046, you can see Mr Chauvin's knee between the shoulder blade of Mr Floyd? Yes Sir. Does this appear to be a neck restraint? No Sir
— Sean Dilley NEWS (@seandilleyNEWS) April 6, 2021
“THE BIG TWIST: Moories Hall’s lawyer claims that his client’s testimony could lead to a 3rd-degree murder charge (drug delivery resulting in death). Why does the State object to the prosecution calling Hall as a witness if the State’s legal argument is positional asphyxiation?”
She brings up an interesting point:
BIG TWIST: Moories Hall’s attorney says his testimony could expose him to a 3rd degree murder charge (drug delivery resulting in death).
If the State’s legal theory is positional asphyxiation, why object to the defense calling Hall as a witness?@CourtTV pic.twitter.com/Ypvn4si4lP
— Julie Grant (@JulieCourtTV) April 6, 2021
“ALSO IMPORTANT: Take note of the State’s refusal to grant immunity to Moories Hall. It seems to me that the State wishes to keep the prospect of charging him open in the future.
ALSO IMPORTANT: Notice how the State is not offering Moories Hall immunity from prosecution.
Seems to me the State wants to leave open the possibility of being able to charge him in the future. @CourtTV @CourtTVUK #DerekChauvinTrial #GeorgeFloyd pic.twitter.com/EQZ9t4jegx
— Julie Grant (@JulieCourtTV) April 6, 2021