POLITICS

VIDEO FOUND: George W. Bush Admits to Using Explosives in the 9/11 Attacks

I’m embarrassed to announce that I cast a vote for George W. Bush. Twice.

To be fair, the alternative was not much better.

Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender

Actually, I think I should reword that….

I’m sorry I wasn’t red-pilled enough to grasp what was going on back then.

There weren’t many of us.

The Bushes were seen to be outstanding patriots and Republicans by all.

In reality, we assumed the fight would be between Republicans and Democrats.

We’ve learned our lesson.

We can now see it for what it is: globalists vs nationalists.

Those who despise and wish to destroy America vs. those who adore it.

We can see things well now.

However, there was a period when we backed Bush and believed what he said.

We knew he wasn’t the sharpest tool in the shed even back then.

And that could be his undoing, for I’d been looking for this video for a long time and had finally located it.

This is the footage in which GWB confirms that explosives were used in the 9/11 attacks.

No, it’s not like he “comes clean” and admits everything…more it’s like he’s too stupid to see when he’s mistakenly “told the truth.”

Here’s where you can see it on Rumble:

Have you ever voted for Bush?

Did you cast a ballot for him?

Do you have any regrets now?

Leave a comment in the box below.

By the way, this isn’t the first time someone has claimed there were explosions.

There is enough evidence (together with common sense and faith in what our eyes experienced) to conclude that it was a planned demolition.

Even Trump stated as much during the week of the devastation.

Take a look at this article from the Daily Commercial News:

Despite strong contrary arguments, a McMaster University engineering professor steadfastly maintains the collapse of three World Trade Center buildings after the infamous 9/11 attacks can only be adequately explained if “controlled demolition” is part of the equation.

Robert Korol, a civil engineering professor emeritus and a fellow of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering, authored a report with Steven Jones, former professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter, director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth). The report was titled 15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses published last year in the Europhysics News journal which is a magazine for the European physics community and owned by the European Physical Society.

In the controversial paper, the authors reflect the overarching premise of the AE911Truth, which has collected 2,936 signatures from engineers and architects. Among those petition signatories are 19 who earned their respective degrees in Canada, including 15 who live here.

AE911 Truth posits: “there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that might have been the actual cause of the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7.”

The group has long been controversial and its arguments have ignited many debates. The overwhelming consensus has favoured the official explanation which states that fires burning inside the buildings weakened the structural steel and triggered their collapse. This has consistently been reaffirmed by U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) over the last 16 years.


This item sells for $39.95 on Amazon. Today's special promotion is offering a massive discount on this item. President Trump 2020 Coin (Gold & Silver Plated) - Claim 1 Free OR Claim a Discount + Free Shipping This coin is a symbol of President Trump's victory and success. Get Coin HERE Or Click on the image below.

The Europhysics News editors also recognize the controversy, publishing the article with the following note: “This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation. However, given the timing and the importance of the issue, we consider that this feature is sufficiently technical and interesting to merit publication for our readers. Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility of the authors.”

Reached at his home in Dundas, Ont., Korol shrugs off the controversy.

“I’ve been scratching my head over this one since it happened on Sept. 11, 2001,” he says. “I just couldn’t understand how those buildings collapsed. It didn’t make sense.”

JEFFMOCK/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS — World Trade Center Building 7 is the red-tinted building behind and to the left of the Twin Towers.
While the most iconic images of that fateful day are the collapse of the twin towers World Trade Center 1 (WTC 1) and World Trade Center 2 (WTC 2) within moments of each other, following the fires started by a passenger airplane crashing into each of them, there is a third building most often cited as the smoking gun in the “controlled demolition” theory. This building, World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) was not hit by any aircraft and yet it too imploded like a house of cards, says Korol and his co-authors and others note it housed CIA and Secret Service offices.

“Indeed, neither before nor since 9/11 have fires caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise — nor has any other natural event, with the exception of the 1985 Mexico City earthquake, which toppled a 21-storey office building,” they argue. “Otherwise, the only phenomenon capable of collapsing such buildings completely has been by way of a procedure known as controlled demolition, whereby explosives or other devices are used to bring down a structure intentionally.”

Korol, who has taken contrarian positions on other engineering-related issues, says it’s important to keep challenging the status quo because we need to know how and why the buildings collapsed in order to prevent reoccurrences.

“The fires were on the upper floors, there’s little chance the heat would have spread down and caused the steel columns, or the connectors or floor beams, to sufficiently weaken and collapse in the twin towers,” he tells the Daily Commercial News.

“Also they were treated with a fire retardant which would have insulated them.”

Further, he says, when the structures did fail they did so with such explosive force that pulverized concrete was ejected at high velocity and scattered on a debris field some 370 metres away.

Have you ever voted for Bush?

Did you cast a ballot for him?

Do you have any regrets now?

Leave a comment in the box below.

By the way, this isn’t the first time someone has claimed there were explosions.

There is enough evidence (together with common sense and faith in what our eyes experienced) to conclude that it was a planned demolition.

Even Trump stated as much during the week of the devastation.

Take a look at this article from the Daily Commercial News:

WIKIMEDIA COMMONS/NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION —
On 9/11, an aerial picture of the wreckage of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings. The original footprints of the World Trade Center Twin Towers 1 and 2 as well as Building 7 are shown.
He claims that the most likely explanation is a controlled explosion, most likely involving thermite, and that in the case of WTC 7, 67% of the supporting steel strength in Column 79, which was identified as the cause of the fatal collapse, would have to be lost before it failed, implying temperatures of 660°C.

Sprinkler systems would reduce heat factors, and the general design of the steel structure would isolate any breakdown and prevent a domino-effect collapse, according to the research.

The NIST, on the other hand, believes that the heat factor caused an expansion in the floor beams, pushing them out of their seats and causing the collapse when other components broke due to thermal expansion as well.

Korol and several like-minded colleagues are adamantly opposed.

 

More information can be found here:

Source
www.govinfo.govwww.nytimes.comwww.welovetrump.com

Margaret Taylor

Experienced communications professional with 10 years of experience in international journalism.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

For continue reading on the site please disable the Ad-block