Tucker Carlson Questioned The J6 Committee’s Acknowledgement and Defense Of Ray Epps! We All Know DOJ Is Involved In J6!

After the explosive day of Senate testimony on Capitol Hill, Carlson in his show delivered a knockout blow to the DC Swamp, saying that the DOJ was involved in the J6 Fedusurrection and called Pelosi’s sham J6 commission for the sudden defense of suspected-Fed and notorious 1/6 catalyst Ray Epps.

“It’s been clear for a while now that the department of justice probably had some role in the events of January 6th – it’s obvious. And after hearings on Capitol Hill today, it became even clearer.”

Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here:

Carlson emphasized Ted Cruz’s pointed exchange with FBI National Security Branch Assistant Director Jill Sanborn in the last segment. Criticized her for rejecting to answer several samples, straightforward questions about the Government’s involvement in 1/6.

The lack of answers shows that the federal agents were involved in the J6 events.

Sanborn can’t answer Cruz when he asks point-blank if any Fed agents committed any crimes of violence, and Carlson points out that it should be easily deniable.

“Cruz asked, quote: ‘did any FBI agents or FBI informants commit crimes of violence on January 6th?’ The obvious answer is ‘are you kidding? Come on now, of course the FBI isn’t secretly committing crimes of violence – that’s insane! we are a federal law enforcement agency, we’re not the Tonton Macoute. Next question please.’ 

That’s what Jill Sanborn should have said, but that’s not what she said. instead she replied, quote: ‘I can’t answer that.’

But of Course Jill Sanborn can answer that – and she should be forced to answer that immediately – no sources or methods would be revealed, just answer the question – did they participate in violence or not? why is that hard? 

It tells you alot.”

After calling out Sanborn, Carlson torched Assistant US Attorney General Matt Olson for his equally pathetic testimony from earlier in the day.

“I simply don’t have any information at all about that individual,” Olson responded.

“They really expect you to believe that. So, the DOJ knows nothing about Ray Epps – the guy on the most wanted list – Right….” Carlson added.

If the Dems had interviewed this guy and cleared him of all suspicions, why did they wait this long to announce this?

“That’s absurdly false, and as if to underscore how absurdly false it is, within a short time [after the testimony] Democrats on the January 6th committee released a statement claiming that – actually – they had already interviewed Ray Epps, and anyone who still has questions about his behavior on January 5th or 6th is a dangerous conspiracy theorist. 

When exactly, and under what circumstances did the committee talk to Ray Epps? Supposedly this interview was conducted in secret this last November. If that is true – we don’t know that it is, but let’s say that it is – Then why did the committee wait months to tell us today in a tweet? When the committee got its hands on Mark Meadows’ text messages, we seem to remember they leaked those to the media within hours.

And by the way was this Ray Epps interview conducted under oath? Did Democrats subpoena his electronic communications, as they did with Meadows and so many others? Will the information that Epps revealed to the committee be made availible to the January 6th defendants who are now awaiting trial? Can their lawyers see a transscript of this interview? – Can we see a transcript of this interview?

If not, why not?”

Weirdly, the Dem’s acknowledgment of Epps is that they have flipped the script describing his actions on J6, with cry-baby RINO Rep. Adam Kinzinger even calling him ‘just a protest attendee’ earlier today.

Carlson said:

“[Epps] He wasn’t just someone who was there – he was maybe the central figure there. And yet Democrats, for reasons that aren’t at all clear, suddenly seem highly protective of Ray Epps. They don’t want you to criticize him.

Adam Kinzinger described Ray Epps today as, quote: ‘nothing but a January 6th protest attendee.’ – Really? nothing but an attendee? He is of course the opposite of that. Of everyone there, Ray Epps is the one you should be maddest at – if you are the democratic party – and yet they’re telling you he was just an attendee – not an insurrectionist, not a terrorist – just an attendee.”

The Gateway Pundit Twitter

Addison Wilson

A passionate teacher in English Language and Literature ready to give her best! Developing and implementing diverse curriculums covering a wide range of subjects. With my problem-solving skills, every job will be easily completed, so punctuation is my strength. Highly skilled at motivating students through positive encouragement and reinforcement of concepts via interactive classroom instruction and observation. My working style fits every personality type, so it makes me a great team player. I have completed numerous journalistic projects successfully, so digging for further information is my field. Fighter for freedom of speech! The truth must be revealed!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

For continue reading on the site please disable the Ad-block