The National Institutes of Health Correct Fauci’s Lies!

But they’re doing this quietly – they obviously don’t want to get in his way, but neither do they want to face the consequences of them cooperating with his lies.

Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here:

Several misstatements were made by Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Dr. Francis Collins, Director of the National Institutes of Health, regarding the NIH’s funding of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

According to the report published by Trending Politics,

“The NIH has demanded that EcoHealth Alliance, the third-party ‘non-profit’ that funneled the money to the Wuhan lab come clean about the research that was actually taking place. The admission was noted by Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology Richard H. Ebright.

“NIH corrects untruthful assertions by NIH Director Collins and NIAID Director Fauci that NIH had not funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan,” Professor Ebright notes. “NIH states that EcoHealth Alliance violated Terms and Conditions of NIH grant AI110964.”

However, Ebright pointed out that the NIH knew about the documents in 2018, and reviewed them repeatedly.

“The NIH received the relevant documents in 2018 and reviewed the documents in 2020 and again in 2021,” Ebright said. “The NIH–specifically, Collins, Fauci, and Tabak–lied to Congress, lied to the press, and lied to the public. Knowingly. Willfully. Brazenly.”

Below you may find the full content of the letter that the NIH provided to Rep. James Comer (R-KY).

Defensive tone, right?

Also, Rep. Mark Meadows highlighted one exchange between Dr. Fauci and Sen. John Kennedy that shows that the NIAID Director lied to Congress.

also, regarding the illocial grant proposal by EcoHealth Alliance, this is what the Telegraph reported.

“The Telegraph contacted a pandemic expert with the World Health Organization who commented on the finding, noting that the research would result in a virus that had no clear ancestor in nature.

Explaining the proposal, a WHO collaborator, who has asked not to be named for fear of reprisals, said: “This means that they would take various sequences from similar coronaviruses and create a new sequence that is essentially the average of them. It would be a new virus sequence, not a 100% match to anything.

“They would then synthesize the viral genome from the computer sequence, thus creating a virus genome that did not exist in nature but looks natural as it is the average of natural viruses,” the researcher said.

“Then they put that RNA in a cell and recover the virus from it,” the researcher added. “This creates a virus that has never existed in nature, with a new ‘backbone’ that didn’t exist in nature but is very, very similar as it’s the average of natural backbones.”

The Telegraph notes that although Dr. Peter Daszak’s proposal was rejected, it is impossible to know what research was conducted at the Wuhan laboratory:

Although the grant proposal was rejected in 2018, the Wuhan database of viral strains was taken offline prior to the Covid outbreak some 18 months later, meaning it is impossible to check which viruses the team was working on or had created. Wuhan scientists have consistently denied creating Sars-CoV-2 in a lab.

“If Sars-CoV-2 comes from an artificial consensus sequence composed of genomes with more than 95% similarity to each other… I would predict that we will never find a really good match in nature and just a bunch of close matches across parts of the sequence, which so far is what we are seeing,” the WHO source said.”


Ava Garcia

A small town girl, dreaming big, expecting to change the world with presenting the truthful events of the world today. Law degree with a master in criminology, and a devoted journalist for over 7 years, and counting. "The pen is mightier than the sword."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

For continue reading on the site please disable the Ad-block