ALEXA’S DAILY RECOMMENDATIONMEDIA WATCHPOLITICSUS

The KRAKEN – Released! AZ Sen. Sony Borrelli Asked AG Mark Brnovich To Investigate County Noncompliance! [Files SB 1487]

Maricopa County and Dominion moved on to defy legislative subpoenas for the items needed by the AZ Senate to finish the forensic audit in the state history.

Jack Sellers lettered the Senate, mocking citizen efforts to preserve our right to vote, secure our election, and save our country.

Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender

Sellers doesn’t want us to see what’s on the routers. Who China Jack works for? A judge, legal and enforceable, ruled the subpoenas, and the county violated the law.

AZ State Sen. Sonny Borrelli has another way to get what he wants.

In his AZ State Senator time, Congressman Andy Biggs introduced AZ SB 1487, which gives the legislature members the power to enact an investigation by the AG’s office into law violations by a county, city, or town.

When one law is violated, the AG has to provide notice that the county, city, or town has only thirty days to solve the violation. If they cannot do it within the allowed 30 days,” the treasurer shall withhold state shared revenue from the county, city, or town. Shared funds will not be returned to the county, city, or town until the violation is resolved.”

Maricopa County violated the law and will lose state funding if they don’t cooperate.
Read SB 1487 below:

SB 1487

Introduced by
Senators Biggs, Kavanagh, Smith, Yee; Representatives Farnsworth E, Petersen: Senators Allen S, Begay, Farnsworth D, Shooter

AN ACT

AMENDING TITLE 41, CHAPTER 1, ARTICLE 5, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING SECTION 41-194.01; AMENDING SECTIONS 42-5029 AND 43-206, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES; RELATING TO STATE SHARED REVENUES.

Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1. Title 41, chapter 1, article 5, Arizona Revised Statutes,

is amended by adding section 41-194.01, to read:

41-194.01. Violations of state law by counties, cities and towns; attorney general investigation; report;

                    withholding of state shared revenues

A. AT THE REQUEST OF ONE OR MORE MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATURE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL INVESTIGATE ANY ORDINANCE, REGULATION, ORDER OR OTHER OFFICIAL ACTION ADOPTED OR TAKEN BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF A COUNTY, CITY OR TOWN THAT THE MEMBER ALLEGES VIOLATES STATE LAW OR THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA.

B. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL MAKE A WRITTEN REPORT OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AS A RESULT OF THE INVESTIGATION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE REQUEST AND SHALL PROVIDE A COPY OF THE REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR, THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, THE MEMBER OR MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATURE MAKING THE ORIGINAL REQUEST AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE. IF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CONCLUDES THAT THE ORDINANCE, REGULATION, ORDER OR OTHER ACTION UNDER INVESTIGATION:

1. VIOLATES ANY PROVISION OF STATE LAW OR THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL PROVIDE NOTICE TO THE COUNTY, CITY OR TOWN, BY CERTIFIED MAIL, OF THE VIOLATION AND SHALL INDICATE THAT THE COUNTY, CITY OR TOWN HAS THIRTY DAYS TO RESOLVE THE VIOLATION. IF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DETERMINES THAT THE COUNTY, CITY OR TOWN HAS FAILED TO RESOLVE THE VIOLATION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL:

(a) NOTIFY THE STATE TREASURER WHO SHALL WITHHOLD AND REDISTRIBUTE STATE SHARED MONIES FROM THE COUNTY, CITY OR TOWN AS PROVIDED BY SECTION 42-5029, SUBSECTION L AND FROM THE CITY OR TOWN AS PROVIDED BY SECTION 43-206, SUBSECTION F.

(b) CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE RESPONSE OF THE GOVERNING BODY, AND WHEN THE OFFENDING ORDINANCE, REGULATION, ORDER OR ACTION IS REPEALED OR THE VIOLATION IS OTHERWISE RESOLVED, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL NOTIFY:

(i) THE GOVERNOR, THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE MEMBER OR MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATURE MAKING THE ORIGINAL REQUEST THAT THE VIOLATION HAS BEEN RESOLVED.

(ii) THE STATE TREASURER TO RESTORE THE DISTRIBUTION OF STATE SHARED REVENUES TO THE COUNTY, CITY OR TOWN.

2. MAY VIOLATE A PROVISION OF STATE LAW OR THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL FILE A SPECIAL ACTION IN SUPREME COURT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, AND THE SUPREME COURT SHALL GIVE THE ACTION PRECEDENCE OVER ALL OTHER CASES. THE COURT SHALL REQUIRE THE COUNTY, CITY OR TOWN TO POST A BOND EQUAL TO THE AMOUNT OF STATE SHARED REVENUE PAID TO THE COUNTY, CITY OR TOWN PURSUANT TO SECTION 42-5029 AND 43-206 IN THE PRECEDING SIX MONTHS.

3. DOES NOT VIOLATE ANY PROVISION OF STATE LAW OR THE CONSTITUTION OF ARIZONA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL TAKE NO FURTHER ACTION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.

AZ AG Mark Brnovichspoke about the States’ rights and duties to handle elections proactively and secure the elections.

Source
The Gateway Pundit Azleg

Addison Wilson

A passionate teacher in English Language and Literature ready to give her best! Developing and implementing diverse curriculums covering a wide range of subjects. With my problem-solving skills, every job will be easily completed, so punctuation is my strength. Highly skilled at motivating students through positive encouragement and reinforcement of concepts via interactive classroom instruction and observation. My working style fits every personality type, so it makes me a great team player. I have completed numerous journalistic projects successfully, so digging for further information is my field. Fighter for freedom of speech! The truth must be revealed!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

For continue reading on the site please disable the Ad-block