What’s happening with them?
The grant proposal by EcoHealth Alliance received funding from the Fauci-run NIAID to create a new coronavirus at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, reported the Daily Mail.
US and Chinese scientists planned to create a new coronavirus before the pandemic erupted, leaked proposals show.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
Last month, a grant application submitted to the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) revealed that an international team of scientists had planned to mix genetic data of similar strains to create a new virus.
The grant application was made in 2018 and leaked to Drastic, the pandemic origins analysis group.
“We will compile sequence/RNAseq data from a panel of closely related strains and compare full-length genomes, scanning for unique SNPs representing sequencing errors,” the grant app states.
“Consensus candidate genomes will be synthesized commercially using established techniques and genome-length RNA and electroporation to recover recombinant viruses,” it added.
The Telegraph asked the pandemic expert with the WHO, who commented on the finding, noting that the investigation would result in a virus that had no clear ancestor in nature.
‘’Explaining the proposal, a WHO collaborator, who has asked not to be named for fear of reprisals, said: “This means that they would take various sequences from similar coronaviruses and create a new sequence that is essentially the average of them. It would be a new virus sequence, not a 100 percent match to anything.’’
“They would then synthesize the viral genome from the computer sequence, thus creating a virus genome that did not exist in nature but looks natural as it is the average of natural viruses,” the expert answered.
“Then they put that RNA in a cell and recover the virus from it,” the researcher added. “This creates a virus that has never existed in nature, with a new ‘backbone’ that didn’t exist in nature but is very, very similar as it’s the average of natural backbones.”
The Telegraph highlighted that even though Dr. Peter Daszak’s proposal wasn’t accepted, no one could know what research was performed at the Wuhan lab.
Although the grant proposal was rejected in 2018, the Wuhan database of viral strains was taken offline prior to the Covid outbreak some 18 months later, meaning it is impossible to check which viruses the team was working on or had created. Wuhan scientists have consistently denied creating Sars-CoV-2 in a lab.
“If Sars-CoV-2 comes from an artificial consensus sequence composed of genomes with more than 95 percent similarity to each other… I would predict that we will never find a really good match in nature and just a bunch of close matches across parts of the sequence, which so far is what we are seeing,” the WHO source said.
“The problem is that those opposed to a lab leak scenario will always just say that we need to sample more, and absence of evidence isn’t evidence of absence,” the expert added. “Scientists overall are afraid of discussing the issue of the origins due to the political situation. This leaves a small and vocal minority of biased scientists free to spread misinformation.”
This September, the docs revealed that the NIAID, led by Fauci, funded the US-based non-profit EcoHealth Alliance to do the high-risk research at the Wuhan Lab, China.
The documents were shared by the Intercept linked to the lawsuit against the NIH. It encompasses more than 900 unpublished pages of docs on EcoHealth Alliance.
“This is a roadmap to the high-risk research that could have led to the current pandemic,” said Gary Ruskin. Ruskin is the executive director of the US Right To Know, and he investigated the origin of the C-19 virus.
“The bat coronavirus grant provided the EcoHealth Alliance with a total of $3.1 million, including $599,000 that the Wuhan Institute of Virology used in part to identify and alter bat coronaviruses likely to infect humans,” The Intercept reports.
“Even before the pandemic, many scientists were concerned about the potential dangers associated with such experiments. The grant proposal acknowledges some of those dangers: ‘Fieldwork involves the highest risk of exposure to SARS or other CoVs while working in caves with high bat density overhead and the potential for fecal dust to be inhaled.’”
“The grant was initially awarded for a five-year period — from 2014 to 2019. Funding was renewed in 2019 but suspended by the Trump administration in April 2020,” the report continued.
The Intercept’s report is sparse detailing the contents of the docs, and they give us a clear image of the research Fauci funded.