Rittenhouse Team Files Motion Showing Prosecutors Evidence That Could Clear Their Client! Mistrial With Prejudice!
The Rittenhouse defense team has now filed a motion for a mistrial with prejudice on behalf of the defendant over the Wisconsin prosecutorial team. As evidence, they show a high-quality video that will exonerate Kyle Rittenhouse.
Human Events Senior Editor Jack Posobiec released his team’s motion. He shared the prosecutorial misconduct that would lead to a mistrial with prejudice.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
The second page says that the prosecution can’t argue presumed guilt over post-arrest silence.
The third page is about turning over to the defense drone footage. The defense stated that the prosecutors gave them compressed footage while owning higher definition footage.
The fourth page stated that prosecutorial overreaching could lead to a mistrial that would bar double jeopardy.
The fifth page of the motion says that the prosecution has acted in bad faith.
The next page emphasized that the state has “repeatedly violated instructions from the Court, acted in bad faith and intentionally provided technological evidence which was different from theirs.”
In conclusion, the motion stated that the defendant respectfully requests that the Court find “prosecutorial overreaching” existed and that “overreaching was intentional and in bad faith.”
“The average jury,” Carlson said, “reaches a verdict in just a few hours, so these jurors are taking much longer than most, but it’s probably not because the evidence they have heard is confusing them.”
Tucker said that the verdict is evident and “no honest person could reach a different conclusion” than Rittenhouse had acted in self-defense.
“The question is why is it taking so long for this jury to produce a pronounced verdict?” Carlson asked. “Want the answer? Well, look outside the courtroom. There are hundreds of National Guard troops assembled tonight in Kenosha. Why are they there? Well, they have come in case Kyle Rittenhouse is acquitted.”
“If he is acquitted, pretty much everyone expects the usual mobs of Joe Biden voters to burn and loot and destroy,” he continued. “Why does everyone expect this? Because people on the left are openly calling for it.”
Two of the jurors don’t want to come forward with their verdicts due to backlash, stated Human Events Senior Editor Jack Posobiec.
More: Worried about media leaking their names, what will happen to their families, jobs, etc
— Handbrake Poso (@JackPosobiec) November 16, 2021
They are “worried about media leaking their names, while will happen to their families, jobs, etc.,” he added. Posobiec also said the concerns included “doxxing threats from ‘anarchist groups.'”
BLM activists are caught trying to dox the jury.
“This morning at the pickup, there was someone there [who] was video recording the jury. The officers approached the person and required him … to delete the video,” Judge Bruce Schroeder told his courtroom Tuesday. “If it happens again,” police are “instructed to take the phone” used to record the Court, the judge added.
“Cortez Rice, who is a BLM activist in Minnesota, says on video that jurors in the Kenosha trial of Kyle Rittenhouse are being photographed,” Wisconsin Right Now reported.
“The jurors’ names in the trial were sealed by the judge, making it harder for them to be doxxed,” the report added. : However, the public has access to the court proceedings, where the jurors sit in plain view. Only journalistic pool photographers are allowed inside the courtroom.”
However, Rice shared a different story.
“I ain’t even gonna name the people that I know that’s up in the Kenosha trial. But it’s cameras in there. It’s definitely cameras up in there. There are definitely people taking pictures of the juries and everything like that,” Rice said.
Later he stated that he didn’t know that people spied on the Rittenhouse jurors.
“Your Honor, I didn’t know that under your black robes of justice, you wear a white robe of the klan,” one email read. “There is no way a fair trial can be heard under your supervision. Better yet, resign.”
“Enjoy your term, judge; it’s going to be your LAST,” another read. “If I ever meet you in person, I fully intend to spit directly into your face, regardless of the cost. You’re disgusting.”
“Make sure and tell Schroeder what a worthless piece of s*** he is,” one email said. “He’ll find out officially when his heart seizes up in a few years, and he has to stand before a real judge.”
He promises that he will solve the problem with the threatening email senders. “I wouldn’t want to be those people,” he added.