NEW SUBPOENA: With Every Issue, Durham Is Getting Closer To Hillary!
I bet she can feel him breathing in her neck – and she is not cold-blooded regarding this tension.
Oh no, believe me. Even despite all the long years of politics behind her.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
Not only was a subpoena issued for Hillary’s camp but also for the DNC as well… and we found this out thanks to a court filing submitted by Michael Sussman’s attorneys on Friday.
BizPacREview’s report didn’t fault to once again remind and update on the ‘missing links’ – not to be forgotten.
“Sussmann was a Perkins Coie lawyer who, while working for Clinton’s 2016 campaign, allegedly colluded with a “tech executive” at an “Internet company” to intercept and access former President Donald Trump’s internet traffic data.
After obtaining dirt on Trump, Sussmann then forwarded the dirt to the FBI, claiming at the time that he was merely acting as a “good citizen” versus working for someone. Last September, a federal grand jury indicted him over this alleged lie.
Durham has been attempting to prove that Sussmann’s actions were part of a “joint venture or conspiracy” involving Clinton’s campaign.
To do so, he requested access to the Clinton campaign’s legal and research activity, but the campaign has reportedly been fighting back.
“Clinton’s campaign, the DNC, the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, and the Perkins Coie law firm are fighting Durham’s efforts to compel the submission of withheld documents, arguing their claims of attorney-client privilege should keep the records concealed,” according to the Washington Examiner.
“In sworn statements, top Clinton officials John Podesta, Robby Mook and Marc Elias maintain that work Fusion GPS did for the Clinton campaign could be considered part of legal work — and should be protected under attorney-client privilege,” according to CNN.
But here’s the key to this whole thing…
Every meeting featured Clinton’s rep, Sussman, and thus every meeting was “billed to the Clinton Campaign,” according to Durham.”
“The goal of the joint venture could not have been more clear: it was to gather and disseminate derogatory non-public information regarding the internet activities of a political candidate and his associates. And that venture was far from collateral to the charged crime. Indeed, the above-described joint venture was the very project that led Tech Executive-1 to rely upon the defendant’s services; the very project that gave rise to the Russian Bank-1 allegations; the very project that prompted agents of the Clinton Campaign to meet with Tech Executive-1; and the very project that caused the defendant to meet with the FBI General Counsel and lie to him about the clients who were behind all of this work,” he further stated.
