The latest analysis shows that FB CEO Mark Zuckerberg bought the 2020 election for Joe Biden with staggering hundreds of millions of dollars in funding!
The Federalist reported that William Doyle from the Caesar Rodney Election Research Institute CRERI released new research showing that election funding funneled by Zuckerberg via two non-profits “significantly increased Joe Biden’s vote margin in key swing states.”
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
“The Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) and The Center for Election Innovation and Research (CEIR) passed a staggering $419.5 million of Zuckerberg’s money into local government elections offices,” stated Doyle, ex-chair in the Department of Economics at the University of Dallas.
“The massive influx of funds essentially created a high-powered, concierge-like get-out-the-vote effort for Biden that took place inside the election system, rather than attempting to influence it from the outside,” Doyle added.
“We call this the injection of structural bias into the 2020 election, and our analysis shows it likely generated enough additional votes for Biden to secure an Electoral College victory in 2020.”
Aided by a machine-leading algorithm, CRERI stated that Zuckerberg increased Biden’s votes to 200,000 only in Texas. However, those votes weren’t sufficient to flip the state blue, but grant money from CTCL and CEIR probably pushed Biden to the top in the swing states.
“Our preliminary results in Georgia and Wisconsin suggest a similar impact on Biden’s vote margin from CTCL spending,” Doyle explained. “And spending in those states was likely large enough and targeted enough to have shifted them into Biden’s column.”
Biden won the Georgia presidential election with only 11,000 votes and Wisconsin with approximately 20,000 votes.
“We have good reason to anticipate that the results of our work will show that CTCL and CEIR involvement in the 2020 election gave rise to an election that, while free, was not fair.”
SHADOW Election System
From Doyle’s report, we can see that Zuckerbeergs created a shadow election system having a structural bias that automatically favored Democratic voters over Republicans.
Zuckerberg’s grants favored non-profits rivaled federal, and state C-19 linked election expenses, with CRCL and CEIR together accounting “for an 85 percent increase in total additional election funding — and that largess was concentrated in a relatively small number of heavily Democratic municipalities.” Stated Doyle.
Left-wing activists funded the two organizations with links to top progressive advocacy groups.
“Although CTCL and CEIR are chartered as non-partisan 501(c)(3) corporations, our research suggests the $419.5 million of CTCL and CEIR spending that took place in 2020 was highly partisan in its distribution and its effects,” Doyle stated.
Approximately 99% of CTCL grants of $1 million in the swing states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Virginia went to cities and states where Biden was declared to be the winner.
Furthermore, somewhere, the funds obtained by the Democrat-leaning areas had more than a 10-1 advantage in election resources. The Wisconsin cities’ grant program “allowed these Democrat strongholds to spend roughly $47 per voter, compared to $4 to $7 per voter in traditionally Republican areas of the state,” the Amistad Project revealed in December.
“Big CTCL and CEIR money had nothing to do with traditional campaign finance,” Doyle’s report added. “It had to do with financing the infiltration of election offices at the city and county level by left-wing activists, and using those offices as a platform to implement preferred administrative practices, voting methods, and data-sharing agreements, as well as to launch intensive outreach campaigns in areas heavy with Democratic voters.”
At the beginning of 2021, Wisconsin’s investigation shared that a left-wing activist linked to CTC: had access to a ballot room in Green Bay and helped in ballot handling.
Also, in Philadelphia, CTCL forced the city to deploy ballot drop boxes, so ballot curing was unavailable to Republican counties and paid some election judges. “These irregularities existed wherever Zuckerberg’s money was granted to local election officials,” the watchdog said.
ARE THE ELECTIONS ON SALE?
CRERI’s discoveries made the Republicans furious. “My reaction is that this was a carefully orchestrated attempt to convert official government election offices into get-out-the-vote operations for one political party and to insert political operatives into election offices to influence and manipulate the outcome of the election,” stated Hans von Spakovsky, ex-member of the Federal Election Commission.
“All states should ban private funding of government election offices no matter the source,” said Spakovsky, adding that Zuckerberg’s funding “violated fundamental principles of equal treatment of voters since it may have led to unequal opportunities to vote in different areas of a state.”
In his latest conference, Ron DeSantis also criticized the private money infusion into America’s elections, classifying these tactics as totally unacceptable.
“So, Zuckerberg, he spent over $400 million through these, quote, non-profits to, quote, help with election administration,” DeSantis said. “But what they would do is they would require certain things to be done like mass mail balloting, ballot harvesting, and they would focus on partisan voter turnout, basically. That was totally unacceptable.”
Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson stated that he doubts if Zuckerberg’s highly partisan 2020 election spending was legal.
“While we still don’t know all that happened, public reporting on his influence over the 2020 elections in Green Bay and other Democrat strongholds raises enough suspicion,” he claimed.
“Are our elections for sale?” Senator Rand Paul tweeted.
Are our elections for sale? Did Mark Zuckerberg purchase the Wisconsin Presidential election?https://t.co/QdyifxMGPD
— Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) October 13, 2021