Midazolam Used To Kill People Who Were Told Had Died Due To COVID-19! Here’s The Proof!
In March 2020 British had to stay at home to protect themselves from the virus. They also were told that the authorities needed three weeks to flatten the curve.
Why they had to stay at home? Maybe because they fear of new virus that originated in Wuhan, China? The virus that ‘’killed’’ 128,000 people to date in the UK, or we were told that way?
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
We can prove that we have passed 15 months in a lie! It’s not a simple lie, but it is a kind of a lie that includes killing people and telling their families that they have died due to covid-19 complications. It was a lie that involved murder. It requires only three things, fear, compliance, and the drug Midazolam.
Authorities shared that COVID-19 is a contagious disease, and the WHO told us: “Most people infected with the COVID-19 virus will experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment”. However, they state that “older people and those with underlying medical problems like cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and cancer are more likely to develop serious illness.”
Covid-19 causes serious pneumonia and respiratory insufficiency. So, the symptoms are breathlessness, cough, weakness, and fever. Also, people who suffer deteriorating respiratory failures and don’t receive proper care have acute respiratory distress syndrome with severe breathlessness.
British Lung Foundation shared:
Pneumonia is an inflammation of one or both lungs, usually caused by an infection. It causes the alveoli (air sacs) inside the lungs to fill with fluid, making it harder for them to work properly. The body sends white blood cells to fight the infection, and while this helps kill the germs, it can also make it harder for the lungs to pass oxygen into the bloodstream.
Pneumonia is not a new condition that has appeared due to Covid-19. In 2019 alone, the year prior to the alleged emergence of Covid-19, 272,000 people were admitted to the hospital with pneumonia. According to the British Lung Foundation, in 2012, 345 people per every 100,000 had one or more episodes of pneumonia. This equates to around 225,000 people suffering from pneumonia at least once.
The British Lung Foundation shared that pneumonia cases happen in those people older than 81. In 2012, 1,838 people in 100,000 people older than 81, developed pneumonia. It equals 60,000 people out of 3.2 million over the age of 80 in the UK.
In 2012, there were 28,592 deaths caused by pneumonia, 5.1% of all deaths that year.
The pneumonia deaths didn’t just happen out of nowhere because of the emergence of the new disease COVID-19, we had it previously, but now it is 24/7 on TV, and the media is spreading panic.
With the purpose to prove that you were living in a lie for the past 15 months or so, we first have to tell you which age group was most affected by the COVID-19 disease, according to the officials.
In the graph above, you can see the deaths from the 28 past days of positive covid-19 tests, with the death date and age of the person. The information is from the UK Gov’s covid-19 dashboard.
From the data, the most alleged covid-19 deaths happened in people aged 90+, on the second place we have the age group 85-89, then 80-84, and so on. There’s a decrease in the number of deaths in the age group 65-69.
But, the dramatic fall is at the age under 60.
So, from the graph, we can see only nine deaths per day from the age group 60-64. In the 65-69, we have a maximum of 20 deaths per day. In the next group, 48 deaths maximum, and that’s the highest number. One hundred seventy-nine deaths are the highest number of COVID-19 alleged deaths. In the 90+ age group, we can notice 379 deaths in a day.
It is a negligible amount of deaths in people under the age of 60. But, we can’t see deaths about the age 60-80. And there are a lot of deaths in people over 85. But is that something weird or strange?
We aren’t saying that in 2020 we didn’t have excess deaths, but it isn’t so because the hospitals were overwhelmed because they weren’t.
HHS data shows that in the first wave in April 2020, there were 58,005 beds taken or 62% occupancy. It’s 30% less than the same period during the previous year.
In 2017, April-June, there were, on average, 91,724 beds occupied, which equated to 89.1% occupancy.
In 2018, April-June, there were, on average, a total of 91,056 beds occupied, which equated to 89.8% occupancy.
In 2019, April-June, there were on average 91,730 beds occupied, which equated to 90.3% occupancy.
In 2020, April-June, there were, on average, a total of 58,005 beds occupied, which equated to 62% occupancy.
c
A&E attendance in the first wave was 57% down on the previous year.
2018 – April – 1,984,369 attended A&E
2019 – April – 2,112,165 attended A&E
2020 – April – 916,581 attended A&E
But there were 41.627 more deaths than the last five years until May 1, 2020, and the majority happened in April.
The Data from the ONS shares that in April 2020 were reported 26,541 deaths in care homes, and an increase of 17,850 on the five-year average. It represents half of the alleged COVID-19 deaths in the same period.
Why people died at hospitals and care homes? If they developed some severe complications, would they have asked for urgent medical attention and hospital treatment?
Well, they were in care homes and not in hospital because Matt Hancock ordered it. On March 19, an order was sent to the NHS where the people had to discharge all patients deemed not to require a hospital bed. The transfers from the ward happened only one hour after the order arrived, and the hospital discharge occurred in 2 hours. That freed the beds, where they estimated that they would need 15 000 free beds within one week of the directive.
The hospitals were empty because of this dismiss, so in April, the hospitals were 30% emptier than the previous year. Matt Hancock’s abandonment of the older adults didn’t finish here. The NHS was discharging patients who needed medical treatment into care homes under his order, and they were busy attempting to source them all a particular drug called MIDAZOLAM.
It is a drug used in palliative care, and it is among the four crucial medicines for the promotion of quality care in dying patients in the UK. You can count this as diazepam on steroids.
It is used in executions by lethal injection in the USA, combined with two other drugs. It reacts as a sedative to make the prisoner unconscious, and the other medicines stop the lungs and heart.
The drug is the causer of life-threatening breathing problems like shallow, slowed, and temporarily stopped breathing that may cause permanent brain injury, even death.
UK regulators added that patients were treated with this drug only if the doctor had the needed equipment to monitor the lungs and heart. The nurse must be close to you once you receive the medication so that you could breathe normally. The doctor has to be aware of the infection or other problems in your organism.
The medicament is also used before med procedures and surgeries to feel relaxed and prevent event memory. Sometimes, it is given together with the anesthesia.
Another drug usage is to cause decreased consciousness in very ill people in intensive care who are breathing with the machine.
The most important points:
Midazolam induces significant depression of respiration
UK regulators insist Midazolam should only be administered in a hospital or doctor’s office under the supervision of a doctor or nurse to monitor the breathing of the patient in order to provide life-saving treatment to the patient if breathing slows or stops.
Midazolam should be used with extreme caution in elderly patients
The drug induces depression of respiration.
So, if you knew all this, would you still use this drug on your patients? Matt Hancock and his friends allowed that.
In addition, you will read an article that confirms that the UK bought two years’ worth of Midazolam in March 2020 and want to purchase more.
The document states that the drug has to be used before the patient needs mechanical ventilation, a common tool to keep people alive who have severe pneumonia.
The document shares that the drug has to be used before the operation.
Midazolam also can impair the respiration system in the presence of disease or old age.
Also, we have a table confirming drug dosage for older people, and we can read the side effects as cardiorespiratory depression.
From here, we can conclude that more than 2 million operations were canceled at the end of May 2020 to keep free beds for three months for COVID-19 infected individuals.
Such a contradiction! A policy placed before the alleged emergence of the virus states that the drug can be used for sedation, but dosage has to be lowered to 0.5 mg in older patients because of the possible side effects like cardiorespiratory depression, and extreme caution must be performed in administering Midazolam to patients with respiratory disease.
NLM shared the important warning applied to Midazolam:
Midazolam injection may cause serious or life-threatening breathing problems such as shallow, slowed, or temporarily stopped breathing, leading to permanent brain injury or death. You should only receive this medication in a hospital or doctor’s office that has the equipment needed to monitor your heart and lungs and provide life-saving medical treatment quickly if your breathing slows or stops. Your doctor or nurse will watch you closely after receiving this medication to ensure that you are breathing correctly.
Matt Hancock has to share why he allowed doctors to prescribe Midazolam, and it was twice in 2019?
Official data in April 2019 show that there were 21,977 prescriptions for the drug, containing 171,952 items. In April, 45,033 prescriptions were issued, containing 333,229 items. It is a 104, 91% increase in the prescriptions issued and a 93.85% increase in the number of contained items. They were for hospitals but were issued by GP practices, which means they were issued for end-of-life care.
Here you will see the graph on the UK government sharing deaths within 28 days of a positive test result for COVID-19 by date of death.
This is the graph for sharing the data on the Midazolam amount produced every month from January 2019 until March 2021.
There isn’t a difference.
The spikes in production of Midazolam fit the spikes of alleged deaths within 28 days of a positive test.
April 2020 – the huge surge in Midazolam prescriptions out of the hospital and huge surge in production of Midazolam solution.
April 2020 – a huge surge in alleged Covid deaths.
January 2021 – a huge surge in production of Midazolam solution.
January 2021 – a huge surge in alleged Covid deaths.
NHS polity before the COVID-19 emergency stated:
Dosage should be reduced to 0.5mg in the elderly or unwell due to possible side effects, which include cardiorespiratory depression, and extreme caution should be used in administering Midazolam to patients suffering respiratory disease
Hospitals beds in April 2020 30% were down compared to the previous year.
A&E attendance was 57% down in April 2020 compared to the previous year.
Care home deaths were 205% up in April 2020 compared to April 2019.
The vast majority of alleged Covid deaths are people over the age of 85.
We all know it happened because of the Amnesty report and CQC report:
‘Care home managers and staff and relatives of care home residents in different parts of the country told Amnesty International how, in their experience, sending residents to hospital was discouraged or outright refused by hospitals, ambulance teams, and GPs. A manager in Yorkshire said: “We were heavily discouraged from sending residents to hospital. We talked about it in meetings; we were all aware of this.”’
‘Another manager in Hampshire recalled:
There wasn’t much option to send people to hospital. We managed to send one patient to hospital because the nurse was very firm and insisted that the lady was too uncomfortable and we could not do any more to make her more comfortable but the hospital could. In hospital the lady tested COVID positive and was treated and survived and came back. She is 92 and in great shape.
She explained that:
There was a presumption that people in care homes would all die if they got COVID, which is wrong. It shows how little the government knows about the reality of care homes.‘
The son of one care home resident who passed away in Cumbria said that sending his father to hospital had not even been considered:
From day one, the care home was categoric it was probably COVID and he would die of it and he would not be taken to hospital. He only had a cough at that stage. He was only 76 and was in great shape physically. He loved to go out and it would not have been a problem for him to go to hospital. The care home called me and said he had symptoms, a bit of a cough and that doctor had assessed him over mobile phone and he would not be taken to hospital. Then I spoke to the GP later that day and said h would not be taken to hospital but would be given morphine if in pain. Later he collapsed on the floor in
the bathroom and the care home called the paramedic who established that he had no injury and put him back to bed and told the carers not to call them back for any Covid-related symptoms because they would not return. He died a week later.
He was never tested. No doctor ever came to the care home. The GP assessed him over the phone. In an identical situation for someone living at home instead of in a care home, the advice was “go to hospital”. The death certificate says pneumonia and COVID, but pneumonia was never mentioned to us.’
‘A care home manager in Yorkshire told Amnesty International:
In March, I tried to get [a resident] into hospital—the ambulance had employed a doctor to do triage but they said, “Well he’s end of life anyway so we’re not going to send an ambulance” … Under normal circumstances he would have gone to hospital … I think he was entitled to be admitted to hospital. These are individuals who have contributed to society all their lives and were denied the respect and dignity that you would give to a 42-year-old; they were [considered] expendable.‘
‘It is vitally important that older and disabled people living in care homes and in the community can access hospital care and treatment for COVID-19 and other conditions when they need it during the pandemic … Providers should always work to prevent avoidable harm or death for all those they care for. Protocols, guidelines and triage systems should be based on equality of access to care and treatment. If they are based on assumptions that some groups are less entitled to care and treatment than others, this would be discriminatory. It would also potentially breach human rights, including the
right to life, even if there were concerns that hospital or critical care capacity may be reached.’
Before It’s News reported: The reason it was decided it should be abolished is that the review found hospital staff wrongly interpreted its guidance for care of the dying, leading to stories of patients who were drugged and deprived of fluids in their last weeks of life.
The government-commissioned review, headed by Lady Neuberger, found that poor training and a lack of compassion on the part of nursing staff was to blame. Harrowing stories from families revealed they had not been told their loved one was expected to die and, in some cases, were shouted at by nurses for attempting to give them a drink of water. Nursing staff had wrongly thought, under the LCP guidance, that giving fluids was wrong.
The review made 44 recommendations, including the phasing out of the LCP over six to twelve months as individual care plans for the dying were brought in. It stated that only senior clinicians must make the decision to give end-of-life care, along with the healthcare team, and that no decision must be taken out of hours unless there is a very good reason.
