ALEXA’S DAILY RECOMMENDATIONPOLITICSUSWORLD

Masks Are Ineffective And Have Side Effects On People’s Heath!!!

The children are forced to wear masks during the entire day, and here you will read the side effects of that. Before the masks mandates and the pandemic, they were worn at hospitals and other medical facilities. They were worn from the visitors that visit seriously ill patients. Many doctors and nurses stated that the staff wearing masks was a rare event in the medical facilities for more than ten years and more.

The viruses were too small, and the masks won’t stop them, other than sophisticated ones designed for that task, and they were too expensive and complicated for ordinary people to wear and change or clean. Also, it was known that they were harmful to the people.

Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender

There are many floods of lies about the masks, trying to justify the disturbing situation we have today of everyone wearing masks outside healthcare facilities, schools, sports events, etc. It has continued after it was discovered that coronavirus wasn’t as dangerous as people thought. The pandemic hysteria in the first months changed the definition of pandemic, including much less hazardous pathogens. There were many lies by the

WHO, national and regional government leaders, health bureaucrats, the media, and other institutions, and they promoted the vaccine, which is more harmful than the virus itself.

Various face masks studies showed their ineffectiveness!

Surgical mask/cloth face mask studies: Community and Close Contact Exposures Associated with COVID-19 Among Symptomatic Adults ≥18 Years in 11 Outpatient Health Care Facilities — United States, July 2020. The US CDC shared a study that showed that 85% of the people infected with C-19 were masked wearers. Only 3-9% of the study participants never wore a mask.

Original: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6936a5-H.pdf

Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: review. This study used 5462 peer-reviewed articles and 41 grey literature records. “Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to critical shortages of medical-grade PPE. Alternative forms of facial protection offer inferior protection. More robust evidence is required on different types of medical-grade facial protection. As research on COVID-19 advances, investigators should continue to examine the impact on alternatives of medical-grade facial protection.”

Study Article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32371574/

Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. “There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33215698/

Disposable surgical face masks for preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery. “We included three trials, involving a total of 2106 participants. There was no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27115326/

Disposable surgical face masks: a systematic review. Two trials were included in the study among 1453 patients. In the small trial were was a trend linked with fewer infections, and in the large trial, there was no difference among the mask and unmasked participants.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16295987/

Evaluating the efficacy of cloth facemasks in reducing particulate matter exposure. “Our results suggest that cloth masks are only marginally beneficial in protecting individuals from particles<2.5 μm.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27531371/

Face seal leakage of half masks and surgical masks. “The filtration efficiency of the filter materials was good, over 95%, for particles above 5 microns in diameter, but great variation existed for smaller particles. Coronavirus is 0.125 microns. therefore these masks wouldn’t protect you from the virus.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4014006/

Comparison of the Filter Efficiency of Medical Nonwoven Fabrics against Three Different Microbe Aerosols. “The filter efficiencies against influenza virus particles were the lowest” “We conclude that the filter efficiency test using the phi-X174 phage aerosol may overestimate the protective performance of nonwoven fabrics with filter structure compared to that against real pathogens such as the influenza virus.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29910210/

Aerosol penetration through surgical masks. “Although surgical mask media may be adequate to remove bacteria exhaled or expelled by health care workers, they may not be sufficient to remove the submicrometer-size aerosols containing pathogens.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1524265/

Particle removal from air by face masks made from Sterilization Wraps: Effectiveness and Reusability. “We found that 60 GSM face mask had particle capture efficiency of 94% for total particles greater than 0.3 microns.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33052962/

A New Method for Testing Filtration Efficiency of Mask Materials Under Sneeze-like Pressure. This study shows alternatives that could be better options in the pandemic. It’s done on starch particles. The study doesn’t share how big they are, but they can get through the material.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32503823/

Protecting staff against airborne viral particles: in vivo efficiency of laser masks. “The laser mask provided significantly less protection than the FFP2 respirator (P=0.02) and only marginally more protection than the surgical mask. The continued use of laser masks for respiratory protection is questionable. Taping masks to the face only provided a small improvement in protection.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16920222/

Quantitative Method for Comparative Assessment of Particle Removal Efficiency of Fabric Masks as Alternatives to Standard Surgical Masks for PPE. “Worn as designed, both commercial surgical masks and cloth masks had widely varying effectiveness (53 – 75 percent and 28 – 91 percent particle removal efficiency, respectively). Different brands, different results, and only when they applied “nylon layers” did the “efficiency” improve.

Synthetic fibers do not breathe, so this will inevitably affect your breathing.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32838296/

The efficacy of standard surgical face masks: an investigation using “tracer particles.” “Since the microspheres were not identified on the exterior of these face masks, they must have escaped around the mask edges and found their way into the wound.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7379387/

Testing the efficacy of homemade masks: would they protect in an influenza pandemic? “Our findings suggest that a homemade mask should only be considered as a last resort to prevent droplet transmission from infected individuals, so why has the government suggested you make your own when they are not effective?”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24229526/

Using half-facepiece respirators for H1N1. “Increasing the filtration level of a particle respirator does not increase the respirator’s ability to reduce a user’s exposure to contaminants.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19927872/ 

Why Masks Don’t Work Against COVID-19. Our site If full of proof of why the masks are ineffective against the virus and the flu.

Article: https://www.citizensforfreespeech.org/why_masks_don_t_work_against_covid_19?fbclid=IwAR0Qviyvt6BObOg aMij03Cj0fgTcm_gm5jhXcMkO8GcH3Kur-bwib0o8rf8

Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy. The study is full of evidence that the masks don’t protect and stop the C-19 virus.

Article: https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide- 19-social-policy?fbclid=IwAR0Qviyvt6BObOgaMij03Cj0fgTcm_gm5jhXcMkO8GcH3Kur-bwib0o8rf8

Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review. We can find fewer data showing that the masks stop the virus spread. “Exercise with facemask; Are we handling a devil’s sword?” – A physiological hypothesis. “Exercising with facemasks may reduce available Oxygen and increase air trapping preventing substantial carbon dioxide exchange. The hypercapnic hypoxia may potentially increase acidic environment, cardiac overload, anaerobic metabolism, and renal overload, which may substantially aggravate the underlying pathology of established chronic diseases.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20092668/

Use of face masks by non-scrubbed operating room staff: a randomized controlled trial. Surgical infection rates didn’t increase when no-scrubbed personnel didn’t wear face masks.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8239046/

Surgical face masks in modern operating rooms – a costly and unnecessary ritual? When you wear face masks by non-scrubbed staff working in an operating room with forced ventilation is unnecessary.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32590322/

Masks: a ward investigation and review of the literature. Having multiple-layer operating room masks for an everyday visit doesn’t affect nose and throat carriage crates.

2010 Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20575920/

Aerosol penetration and leakage characteristics of masks used in the health care industry. “Conclusion: We conclude that the protection provided by surgical masks may be insufficient in environments containing potentially hazardous submicrometer-sized aerosols.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1680906/

Masks for prevention of viral respiratory infections among health care workers and the public: PEER umbrella systematic review. Meta-analysis reviews tell us that only limited proof suggests that the mask use will reduce the risk of spreading viral respiratory infections.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2873176/

Modeling the Transmission of Coronaviruses, Measles Virus, Influenza Virus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Legionella pneumophila in Dental Clinics. Evidence suggests that transmission is performed by air quality. SO, the second wave isn’t linked with handshaking and mask-wearing.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32614681/

Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings-Personal Protective and Environmental Measures. The face masks don’t play a role in influencing transmission.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32027586/

Effectiveness of personal protective measures in reducing pandemic influenza transmission: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-analyses say that regular hand hygiene gives a protective effect over face masks and their insignificant protection.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28487207/

Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The N95 respirators sided with surgical masks aren’t linked with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32167245/

Adolescents’ face mask usage and contact transmission in novel Coronavirus. Face masks will be contamination sources. People keep them in pockets, bags, putting them on tables.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32582579/

Visualizing the effectiveness of face masks in obstructing respiratory jets. Loosely folded masks and bandanas provide a minimal stop to the virus transmission.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32624649/

Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: a randomized controlled trial. Face Masks in healthcare workers don’t benefit regarding the cold’s symptoms or getting colds.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/

A randomized cluster trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. Penetration of cloth masks by fly particles was 97%, and med masks 47. So cloth masks don’t protect, and med masks are useless.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25903751/

Simple respiratory protection–evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20-1000 nm size particles. “Results obtained in the study show that common fabric materials may provide marginal protection against nanoparticles, including those in size ranges of virus-containing particles in exhaled breath.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20584862/

The respiratory performance offered by N95 respirators and surgical masks: human subject evaluation with NaCl aerosol representing bacterial and viral particle size range. “The study indicates that N95 filtering facepiece respirators may not achieve the expected protection level against bacteria and viruses.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18326870/

Do N95 respirators provide a 95% protection level against airborne viruses, and how adequate are surgical masks? The N95 masks won’t give the needed protection level against small viruses.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16490606/

Do Surgical Masks Stop the Coronavirus? Study article: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/coronavirus-surgical-masks-china.html

Effectiveness of personal protective measures in reducing pandemic influenza transmission: A systematic review and meta-analysis. “N95 respirators made by different companies were found to have different filtration efficiencies for the most penetrating particle size (0.1 to 0.3 micron).”

“Above the most penetrating particle size, the filtration efficiency increases with size; it reaches approximately 99.5% or higher at about 0.75 microns.”

“Meta-analyses suggest that regular hand hygiene provided a significant protective effect (OR=0.62; 95% CI 0.52-0.73; I2=0%), and facemask use provided a non-significant protective effect (OR=0.53; 95% CI 0.16-1.71; I2=48%) against 2009 pandemic influenza infection”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28487207/

Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis. “The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza. It suggests that N95 respirators should not be recommended for the general public or non-high-risk medical staff who are not in close contact with influenza patients or suspected patients.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32167245/

Adolescents’ face mask usage and contact transmission in novel Coronavirus. “As a result, masks surface becomes a contamination source. Ten adults were requested to put on and off a surgical mask in the contact experiment while doing a word processing task. The extended contamination areas were recorded and identified by image analysis.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32582579/

Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: a randomized controlled trial. “Of the eight symptoms recorded daily, subjects in the mask group were significantly more likely to experience headache during the study period” “Face mask use in health care workers has not been demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/

Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial. “The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50 percent in a community with modest infection rates, some degree of social distancing, and uncommon general mask use.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33205991/

A randomized cluster trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. “An analysis of mask use showed ILI (RR=6.64, 95 percent CI 1.45 to 28.65) and laboratory-confirmed virus (RR=1.72, 95 percent CI 1.01 to 2.94) were significantly higher in the cloth masks group compared with the medical masks group. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97 percent and medical masks 44 percent.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25903751/

The respiratory performance offered by N95 respirators and surgical masks: human subject evaluation with NaCl aerosol representing bacterial and viral particle size range. “The study indicates that N95 filtering facepiece respirators may not achieve the expected protection level against bacteria and viruses. An exhalation valve on the N95 respirator does not affect the respiratory protection.”

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18326870/

Performance of N95 respirators: filtration efficiency for airborne microbial and inert particles. C-19 is 0.125 microns, which means that most N95 masks can filter particles as small as 0.75 microns.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9487666/

A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. A Chinese study shows that an airborne C-19 particle passes through an N95 mask.

Study article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31978945/

Airborne coronavirus particles (<0.125 microns) will pass directly through an N95 face mask. “Human coronaviruses measure between 0.1 and 0.2 microns, which is one to two times below the cutoff” This “cut off” refers to the size and N95 mask can trap. Most of us are not using MEDICAL or regular N95s.

Study article: https://www.greenmedinfo.com/article/airborne-coronavirus-particle

 

Source
Life Site News pubmed green med info

Addison Wilson

A passionate teacher in English Language and Literature ready to give her best! Developing and implementing diverse curriculums covering a wide range of subjects. With my problem-solving skills, every job will be easily completed, so punctuation is my strength. Highly skilled at motivating students through positive encouragement and reinforcement of concepts via interactive classroom instruction and observation. My working style fits every personality type, so it makes me a great team player. I have completed numerous journalistic projects successfully, so digging for further information is my field. Fighter for freedom of speech! The truth must be revealed!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

For continue reading on the site please disable the Ad-block