The latest investigation from Durham that was supposed to end a long time ago doesn’t show good news.
Reports show that Durham’s team this month only shared evidence that should have been analyzed months ago.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
Americans know that Obama’s corrupted officials in the 2016 election used fake documents as a basis for spying on the Trump campaign and administration. The dossier represented a lie by the Hillary group and the DOJ, but the FBI used it anyway in a coup attempt to remove Trump from office.
Jeff Sessions was taken out of office, Bill Barr came, and in May 2019 opened an investigation into the beginnings of the Russia collusion sham.
Lawfare blog reported:
In May 2019, Attorney General William Barr tapped Connecticut’s U.S. Attorney John Durham to look into issues related to the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation. Durham is alongtime federal prosecutor inConnecticut known for leadingorganized crime and public corruption cases. In 2008, Attorney General Michael Mukaseytasked Durham with investigating the CIA’s destruction of interrogation videotapes. A year later, Attorney General Eric Holderexpanded Durham’s mandate to examine CIA torture allegations.
Now, Durham is conducting a comprehensive global probe of the U.S. government’s investigation of the Trump Campaign’s connections with Russia. The investigation covers pre- and post-election matters, and reportedly has come to include the unmasking of former national security adviser Michael Flynn, and the basis for the intelligence community’s assessment that Russia tried to help Donald Trump win the election in 2016. These are all matters on which President Trump has publicly commented. Before and after Durham began his investigation, Trump has often claimed, in fiery rhetoric, that the Trump campaign investigation, and the unmasking of Flynn, and the intelligence community’s assessment, were illegitimate. He has also charged that some of the people apparently under investigation by Durham engaged in misconduct on matters under investigation. Attorney General Barr has also publicly commented that some of the people under investigation engaged in serious wrongdoing.
The investigation didn’t discover anything so far.
Yesterday, some documents were revealed in the Durham case. Techno Fog reported:
Today, Special Counsel John Durham provided a “discovery update” to the court in the Michael Sussmann case. In this filing, available here, he disclosed that his team has obtained a tremendous amount of information ranging from a variety of sources – including Perkins Coie, the Hillary Clinton Campaign, and former DNC/Clinton lawyer Mark Elias.
While Sussmann has been charged with giving false statements to then-FBI General Counsel James Baker regarding the Alfa Bank/Trump Organization hoax (background here), Durham notes that the “Government also maintains an active, ongoing criminal investigation of” Sussmann’s conduct.
Conservative Treehouse asked some shocking questions about the Durham investigation:
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has known about the Durham probe of Michael Sussmann for how long? And specifically, the criminal case against Sussmann revolved around the central witness, the point of contact with former FBI General Counsel, Jim Baker. Yet the OIG said nothing to John Durham about their possession of Baker’s phones until this month?
Think about what that tells us?
Under Corney, Baker was the best attorney in the FBI, and he knew FBI actions and crimes linked to the Russia Collusion sham.
After abandoning the FBI, Baker was a member of the National Task Force on the Election Crisis. It was a group of people who aimed to stop any 2020 election audits and investigations.
The Conservative Treehouse reported:
Unfortunately, when you start asking those types of questions, you start to get too close to the heart of the issue. The entire apparatus of the U.S. Dept of Justice and the FBI are corrupt. As to the bigger question: will the Durham probe finally outline all the evidence to prove all the years of deception and fraud perpetrated by the massive aligned system of corrupt government? My short and painful answer is, NO.
The longer answer is attached to the one issue that all researched opinions and analytical theories never touch. The 800lb gorilla in the room that no one will put into their accountability prism, because it blocks all other sunlight:
If Durham was going to reveal the scale of corruption within these institutions, ie. what optimistic folks proclaim as possible; how is Durham going to handle the reality that Robert Mueller’s entire existence was in place to hide it?
The DOJ and FBI are corrupt and weaponized divisions of a corrupt system of U.S. government. The OIG providing willfully blind cover for the corruption within the institutions they are supposed to police is simply more evidence of the rot within them.
The crucial question about the Durham investigation is whether it’s in place to reach the bottom of the Russia Collusion nightmare used by crooked Hillary and Obama cronies in the DOJ to remove Trump from office.