Dr. Shiva Ayyadyrai, the inventor of the email, discussed the ballot anomalies and irregularities present among the 2020 full forensic audit of the 2020 election in Maricopa County,
He wanted to have an open forum with Maricopa officials to understand the Standard Operating Procedure for Early Voting Ballot images and signature verification.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
The officials don’t want to meet with anyone, especially not with auditors. They rely on the fake news media allies and the help of social media propaganda to shared disinformation.
Liz Harrington shared one Twitter clip, sharing massive ballot discrepancies that Maricopa County ignores.
In the limited analysis done by Dr. Shiva for the #AZAudit, he found:
6,545 mail-in ballots with no envelope
2,580 scribbles (bad signatures)
1,919 mail-in ballots with no signature
This amounts to 11,044 ballots, already surpassing the margin of 10,457 in Arizona pic.twitter.com/lBI9xPMTcO
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) October 14, 2021
Read what Dr. Shiva presented this Thursday:
Dr. Shiva: So, yes, one of the questions is, we have 6,545 More ballots than the envelopes. Okay, remember this election was last, lost/won at around 10,500 votes. So 6500 is, you know it’s not a small number, that’s the first thing. The other thing we want to emphasize is, we found 2,580 You know, scribbles about 1,919 blanks, again we didn’t do in detail. Remember we were only looking at the signature region. Okay, now we just did a very simple signature presence detection. Okay, we didn’t have the opportunity to compare all the signature to signature analysis, which is what we believe should be done. Our guesstimate on that would be that would be north of, you know 50,000. We would think we would find significant differences. That’s just from a guesstimate of doing some statistical analysis but we haven’t had the chance to do that. Okay. But the point is that you have 6,500 plus ballots which don’t have envelopes, very important. We have examples again This wasn’t part of our audit scope we did this on our own, we at least have, you know 20 some odd people who have two Voter IDs. Same person with two Voter IDs, both the votes were counted.
Okay. So, if we have a chance to expand our analysis we may find more. But the point is that the image processing that’s done, when they do the curing, you see what I’m saying. The curing is hundreds of thousands of votes that were cured, which means do the signatures match? They contacted people, Right. To find out why they didn’t match. That process, in our view is very very squishy because we don’t understand it. So imagine out of the 1.9 million votes. They said 587 didn’t match but they cured a number. From our guesstimate from looking at it, looks like it was maybe about 100 to 200,000.
So that means 100 to 200,000 in that range or less, phone calls went out to call people to say “Hey, your signatures don’t match,” you following me? Now, how is that process done, how is that adjudicated, right? because there’s a lot of room for play there. And that is why we need these processes. So, especially in a race which was lost by 10,500 votes. Okay, or won by 10,500 odd votes. So it is very important for people on the right to feel comfortable with how the left treated them or the left to feel how the right treated them to just articulate these processes, put it out, so we can all understand it, and move forward. But without that transparency, we’re going to have a Divided States of America.
Dr. Siva asks for transparency, and won’t stop until he gets it.