The study will reach the US Supreme Court and fights the status quo constantly. The globalists and the Biden regime don’t want you to see this!
“We have now initiated our Federal Suit to stop all discrimination against Americans based upon their vaccination status,” The Control Group website stated.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
In 2011, the US Department of Health and Human Services commissioned a study which was performed by Harvard-Pilgrim Healthcare to find out how the US VAERS had been keeping an accounting of the vaccine injuries and deaths the Americans face.
The report starts with “vaccine adverse events are common.” The report concluded that “less than one percent (1%) of vaccine side-effects are ever reported”.
The revelation was concealed and censored by the mainstream media. The censorship is still present and is buttressed by heavy search engines and social media censorship.
Joe Garner, the founder of the Control Group, wrote:
“The vaccine marketing slogan “safe” has always depended upon the disproven adjective ‘rare’ in reference to side effects. In the American Restatement (Second) of Torts 402A (comment k) vaccines are formally classified as ‘unavoidably unsafe’. But we are told vaccines are ‘safe’. Vaccines are not only unsafe, they are ‘unavoidably’ so. And the injuries are common, a minimum of 100 times more common than the VAERS will report
“The fact our obscenely abusive laws currently protect the pharmaceutical industry from any consequences for this fraud, and from the injuries it commonly causes, does not alter the dictionary definition of the word fraud. Few people suffer such severe cognitive dissonance that they would still believe vaccines are ‘safe’ once made aware vaccines are ‘unavoidably unsafe’ products that commonly injure, disable, and kill people.
“Most of the ‘top’ scientists in this field rely heavily upon pharma-funding so they all plead the 5th when it comes to explaining what has injured the immune systems of most Americans. They persist in pretending they’ve got “no idea” as they search for elusive genetic, race, or socioeconomic causes, i.e., anything besides vaccines to blame for all of these immune disorders. This farce keeps their benefactors very happy, but it requires an astounding number of scientifically obtuse “experts” and consistent fraud to sustain it.”
CDC Childhood Vaccine Schedule Put to the Test and Fails!
Another story from 2020 conducted by Dr. James Lyons-Weiler and Dr. Paul Thomas revealed fascinating information.
Children’s Health Defense wrote: “This study adds to a growing list of published peer-reviewed papers that compare the health of vaccinated children to the health of unvaccinated children. These studies suggest we have long underestimated the scope of vaccine harms and that the epidemic of chronic illness in children is hardly a mystery.”
The study shows ‘Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination’ showed that the non-vaccinated children are healthier than the vaccinated children.
The study included 3.300 patients at Dr. Thomas’ Oregon pediatrics practice, integrative Pediatric.
Since 1986, the CDC has had to perform safety studies and release a safety report on children’s vaccinations every two years.
In 2018 it was discovered that they have never done so.
The CDC refused to incriminate in the epidemic of childhood illness. It represents a classic case of the fox guarding the henhouse.
They are complicit in creating an evidence vacuum to manage against the possibility of the public turning against vaccination.
Lyons-Weiler and Thomas’s study proved that vaccinated children develop more chronic illnesses and get respiratory infections. Those who downplay vaccine risk will be sent into another round of apoplectic machinations to try to invalidate the results.
When research emphasizes anomalies that diverge from a dominant scientific paradigm, it’s crucial to mention that the playground of science is not in proof but in the accumulation of evidence that bolsters an emerging paradigm.
The authors call the other scientists to perform more studies to be conducted using a similar methodology; this study has caused pediatricians to pause and wonder if they are contributing to life-long chronic illness in some patients.