Unusual circumstances or a framing worth to be written in a Den Braun novel?
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
It is probably the second one, and read further why…
Pope Benedict XVI which was Pope from 2005-2013, resigned out of nowhere, and it is still not quite clear to the public why…
However, a group of Catholic leaders sent a letter to the previous President of the USA, President Trump in 2017, to do something and investigate what it is, in their opinion, ” sabotage at the top of the Catholic Church.”
“We have reason to believe that a Vatican ‘regime change’ was engineered by the Obama administration.”
“We were alarmed to discover that, during the third year of the first term of the Obama administration your previous opponent, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and other government officials with whom she associated proposed a Catholic ‘revolution’ in which the final demise of what was left of the Catholic Church in America would be realized.”
The claims of this group of Catholics are substantiated.
One year before this letter was sent, in 2016, WikiLeaks leaked emails from Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager, John Podesta, where this senior Democratic Party leader and other progressives discussed regime change to eliminate what they described as the “middle ages dictatorship” in the Catholic Church.
In the emails, it was discovered that Podesta and other activists were working to bring about a “Catholic Spring” revolution.
And according to WikiLeaks, “This “Catholic Spring” is an apparent reference to the disastrous “Arab Spring” coups organized simultaneously, i.e., between 2011 and 2012, by the Obama-Clinton-Soros team. Evidently, something analogous was planned by Podesta, Clinton, and Soros with the Vatican: remove Benedict XVI and put in a radical leftist man: Bergoglio.”
In their letter to President Trump, the group of Catholic leaders describes in amazement how in 2013, just one year after the exchange of emails between Podesta and his cronies in 2012, incredibly Benedict XVI ended up resigning:
“Approximately a year after this e-mail discussion, which was never intended to be made public, we find that Pope Benedict XVI abdicated under highly unusual circumstances and was replaced by a pope whose apparent mission is to provide a spiritual component to the radical ideological agenda of the international left.”
Spanish journalist Arturo Picatoste, that was closely investigating the whole affair, claims that “the Obama Administration closely followed the movements of Benedict XVI’s last days, spying on him: “Under the Obama Administration, the U.S. National Security Agency from Dec. 2012, spied on telephone conversations in Vatican City during the entire conclave.”
According to this Spanish journalist, and taking the letter from 2017 into consideration, to punch the final blow, the Obama Administration, together with George Soros and other financiers of the kind, controlled the movement of money from the Vatican in the last days of Benedict XVI, in such a way that he had no way out, thus, forcing him to resign.
“Benedict’s Vatican was not allowed to do so – continue banking.” Indeed, the day after he announced on Feb. 11, 2013, that he was going to resign, the possibility of handling money reopened.”
“It is very characteristic that image that you see when on Feb. 28, 2013 Benedict is giving the last speech to the cardinals and the cameras focus on the cardinals. And when at that moment they focus on Bergoglio, he realizes and puts his hand on his chest, which is the symbol of Masonic obedience, for many seconds, all the time the camera is focusing on him. Then he makes that same gesture again when he goes out to the balcony when he is elected in that false conclave.”
And here’s the very interesting part – according to Picatoste and the interpretation of the resignation document – the official pope is still Benedict XVI!
“We are very clear that Jorge Bergoglio is not Pope. He is a false pope. He is an antipope. This is already demonstrated juridically, very clearly. In fact, recently some statements have come out that Benedict XVI published in a book by Peter Seewald in 2016, in which he made it very clear that he had not resigned from the munus but only resigned from the ministry. Therefore, according to it, it remains according to the code of canon law, it delimits that his resignation is not valid and that he remains the only reigning pope.”
“That false conclave is a dead letter. Because if the resignation is invalid, then Bergoglio is not pope and that conclave was useless”.
Damn – I feel like I’ve already read a whole book while processing all this information!
What do you think?