The number of children deaths in the UK is skyrocketing; It is higher than the five-year average since they were offered the C-19 shot. The latest researchers claim that the vaccines are available for children because Bill Gates wanted that.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is the primary funder of the UK Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, and the foundation owns major shares in Pfizer and Moderna. So, the vaccination of children against the coronavirus isn’t linked with heath but with money, corruption, and power.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
The MHRA prolonged the authorization of Pfizer shot in the UK to allow it to be given to children between the ages 12-15 on June 4, 2021.
The chief executive of MHRA is Dr. June Raine, and he stated that MHRA had “carefully reviewed clinical trial data in children aged 12 to 15 years and have concluded that the Pfizer vaccine is safe and effective in this age group and that the benefits outweigh any risk”.
We ask if Dr. June Raine and the MHRA have read the studies performed on the vaccines. They would know that 86% of the children had experienced side effects from the vaccines if you have read. One in nine children suffered severe side effects.
Only 1..127 people participated in the trial, and 1.097 completed it; 30 of them didn’t participate after the first shot. The results don’t say why they didn’t want to complete the trial. The data is available and contained within an FDA fact sheet which can be seen here.
Was there a doubt that the MHRA will grant an emergency authorization for the Pfizer vaccine to be used in children whey you regard the fact that a sure Mr. Bill Gates has shares in Pfizer and Moderna and is the primary founder in the MHRA?
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation had shares in Pfizer in 2002, and in September 2020, they ensured the value of the shares went up by announcing to the MSM in a CNBC interview that he saw the Pfizer shot as the best.
“The only vaccine that, if everything went perfectly, might seek the emergency use license by the end of October would be Pfizer.”
The MHRA got a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2017, to the tune of £980,000 for a “collaboration” with the foundation.
No one can trust the MHRA to remain impartial because the primary founder is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
We aren’t surprised that the MHRA extended the EUA of Moderna mRNA shot to 12 -17-year-olds on August 17, 2021.
Dr. June Raine and the MHRA said that its effectiveness in this group is puzzling because less than nine children have died from the coronavirus in the UK, and all of them had other severe underlying conditions. However, the data that we have in the USA show the opposite. The VAERS reported many deaths and severe side effects as a result of the vaccine.
Below you can see examples of that:
A 15-year-old female suffered cardiac arrest and ended up in critical care four days after receiving the Moderna mRNA jab, according to a VAERS report obtained under VAERS ID 1187918. She, too, passed away.
After receiving a second dose of the Moderna injection, another 15-year-old female suffered cardiac arrest and unfortunately died.
Another report, VAERS ID 1261766, indicates that a one-year-old baby was given the Moderna vaccine illegally, causing his body temperature to rise, leading to a seizure, and a one-year death. old’s
The Moderna shot isn’t safe for children. It isn’t even safe for adults, and many countries, especially the Nordic states, have banned its use.
Moderna shared that in 2016, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation granted then $20 million to support “initial project related to the evaluation of antibody combinations in a preclinical setting as well as the conduct of a first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trial of a potential mRNA medicine”.
Moderna also revealed the agreement they had with the foundation and that it will bring the total funding up to $100 million for follow-on projects that are proposed to and approved by the Bill Gates foundation.
Moderna is obliged to grant the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation specific non-exclusive licenses.
The Expose reported:
“A Non-Exclusive Licence grants the licensee the right to use the intellectual property but means that the licensor remains free to exploit the same intellectual property and to allow any number of other licensees also to exploit the same intellectual property.
Therefore under the terms of the agreement made with Moderna, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has now been granted a non-exclusive license to the Moderna mRNA Covid-19 injection and is therefore profiting from its use.
This raises serious concerns about the MHRA’s true motives in granting emergency approval for the Moderna jab to children. Evidence in the USA proves that it has been deadly when given to children, and evidence in the UK proves that children simply do not need it. This suggests the MHRA is much more concerned about appeasing their primary funder, Mr. Bill Gates.
But the corruption doesn’t end there because a confidentiality agreement shows potential coronavirus vaccine candidates were transferred from Moderna to the University of North Carolina in 2019, nineteen days prior to the emergence of the alleged Covid-19 causing virus in Wuhan, China.”
The confidential agreement states that” providers ‘Moderna’ alongside the ‘National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) agreed to transfer ‘mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates’ developed and jointly-owned by NIAID and Moderna to recipients’ The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’ on December 12, 2019.”
The material transfer deal was concluded in December 2019 by Ralph Baric and Jacqueline Quay.
Two more representatives from NIAID signed the contract, Amy F. Petrik and Barney Graham. We don’t have a date for these signatures.
The final signature inked were Sunny Himansu and Shaun Ryan on December 17, 2019.
The contracts are from before the emergence of the coronavirus.
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation offered the children to get the shot against the coronavirus. Professor Christopher Witty, the chief medical officer for England, helped them.
He had a tremendous influence on shaping the UK Government’s response to the alleged coronavirus pandemic.
The JCVI announced that they don’t recommend the vaccine to children at the age of 12. The assessment by JCVI is that the health benefits from the vaccination are marginally greater than the harms we know.
The JCVI cited the following –
“For the vast majority of children, SARS-CoV-2 infection is asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic and will resolve without treatment. Of the very few children aged 12 to 15 years who require hospitalization, the majority have underlying health conditions.”
“In their letter to the Government (found here), the UK CMO’s state they looked at wider public health benefits and risks of universal vaccination in this age group to determine if this shifts the risk-benefit either way. They claim in their letter that “the most important in this age group was impact on education.”
This raises some serious questions –
Did Covid-19 close the schools? The answer is, of course, no. Schools were closed because of Government policy.
Should a person take a medical treatment so that they are able to partake in society or education? The answer is, of course, no. A person should only ever take medical treatment for a medical reason, in the case of the Covid-19 vaccine, that reason should be to prevent infection; which it does not do, or prevent illness; which it will not do as children are at such low risk of suffering severe illness due to Covid-19.
Take a look at the tables below. They will show you the average number of side effects of the vaccines compared to the side effects of the C-19 vaccine.
We compiled the following table of ONS figures so that we were able to easily compare the number of deaths per week among children separated by male and female.
We will leave you with the words of Mr. Bill Gates from a speech he made in 2010 –
“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.”