Another Interview with Dr Mike Yeadon for Vaccines

Dr. Mike Yeadon talked with us about his thoughts on the experimental Covid-19 vaccines, their approval by medicine authorities, and his concerns for the future.

“I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being committed against a significant proportion of the world’s population,” Dr. Yeadon said at the outset.

Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender

“I’m terrified, but that doesn’t stop me from providing expert testimony to a number of capable attorneys, including Rocco Galati in Canada and Reiner Fuellmich in Germany.

“I have no doubt that we are dealing with bad (not a conclusion I’ve ever reached in my 40-year research career) and harmful goods.

“It is painfully clear that the authorities in the United Kingdom are set on a path that will result in the administration of ‘vaccines’ to as many people as possible. This is insane, because even though these agents were real, only those who are at a very high risk of death from the virus need defense. There might also be a case to be made that the risks are worthwhile for certain individuals. And there are risks that are inherent in the way things work, which I refer to as “mechanistic” risks.

“However, those in good health who are less than 60 years old, maybe a little older, do not succumb to the virus. It would be completely immoral to prescribe anything nove in this big community.

“Since I am certain of this, and I am certain that those driving it are as well, we must inquire: What is their motive?”

“While I don’t know, I have clear theoretical answers, only one of which is motivated by money, and that motive fails because the same quantum can be obtained by doubling the unit cost and distributing the agent to half as many people. The problem has been solved. But it’s something different. Appreciating that it is also meant for minor children and ultimately babies to be included in the net by the entire population, and that is what I interpret as an evil act.

“It has no medical justification. Knowing that the design of these ‘vaccines’ results in the expression of the spike protein in the bodies of recipients, which has adverse biological effects of its own that can be harmful to certain people (initiating blood coagulation and activating the immune ‘complement system’), I’m determined to emphasize that those who are not at risk from this virus should not be exposed to the ria virus.

“Any new restrictions on travel into or out of Israel in the future, in legal terms, must have a detailed, credible, data-based foundation,” the Israel Supreme Court said in its decision to lift COVID flight restrictions last week.

You said – in a talk you gave four months ago –

“Immunity to a respiratory virus like SARS CoV-2 is likely to last many years. Why am I saying this? We currently have data for a virus called SARS that spread through parts of the world seventeen years ago, and SARS CoV-2 is 80% close to SARS, so I believe that’s the best analogy anyone can make.

“The proof is in the pudding: These astute cellular immunologists researched as many people as they could find who had survived SARS 17 years ago. They took a blood sample to see how they reacted to the original SARS, and they all did; their T cell memory was completely fine and robust. Since the two viruses are so similar, they were also protected against SARS CoV-2; this is known as cross immunity.

“So, based on the best evidence available, I’d say immunity could last at least 17 years. It’s entirely probable that it’ll last a lifetime. These people’s T cells responded in the same way they would if they had been vaccinated and then returned years later.


Margaret Taylor

Experienced communications professional with 10 years of experience in international journalism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

For continue reading on the site please disable the Ad-block