Attorney Thomas Renz remarked on Truth For Health’s Stop The Shot live conference that the original figure of 45,000 persons who purportedly died within three days of receiving the COVID-19 injections is way too low.
According to Renz, whistleblower VAERS data is currently being evaluated, and it appears that the original estimate he made last month at an Awakened America event was only a fraction of the total number of deaths.
Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender
Renz has filed a petition on behalf of America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) against the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) based on a statement made under penalty of perjury by a whistleblower.
According to Renz, informed consent is a “essential part” of the complaint.
“It’s a very, very crucial component of this,” he told LifeSite. How can you give informed consent about a medicine’s risks if such risks are kept hidden?… Beyond words, utterly corrupt.”
Renz, who is also the lead lawyer in a number of high-profile litigation against federal agencies alleging fraud and violations of medical freedom rights, claims to have proof that the whistleblower’s estimates of 45,000 deaths are grossly exaggerated.
“We picked the most cautious estimate we could in this,” Renz added, “because we wanted to make sure we were being more conservative rather than less,” adding, “Some of the numbers that I have proof on are astronomically higher.”
Renz’s whistleblower is a government-employed computer programmer who works in healthcare data analytics. According to medical claims made to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the fatalities registered to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) are “under-reported by a conservative factor of at least 5,” (which would suggest fatalities nearing 250,000). (CMS).
However, Renz stated that the programmer who had CMS data access was not the only one who had come forward. Another whistleblower contacted Renz this week, claiming the VAERS database is behind on reporting.
Renz stated, citing the whistleblower, that “at least a hundred thousand reports are not in VAERS that should be.” There is absolutely no reason why they aren’t present.”
“But here’s the actual question that everyone should be asking themselves,” he concluded. “Why do we have to make educated guesses? Why isn’t the government letting the public know the truth about this? They acquire data in this way using 11 or 12 distinct approaches. Why hasn’t this been thoroughly investigated and made public? Why did I need a whistleblower to look into it?”
If the government isn’t interested in looking at the data, Renz added, “I’ve got some folks who will support an independent analysis.”
“If they don’t want to trust the whistleblower, that’s fine,” he added. Please provide us with the raw data. I’m going to have an independent analysis done, and then we’ll see what it says.”
According to the Ohio attorney, there is a “major conflict of interest” between public health officials and the pharmaceutical companies who supply COVID-19 injections, and public health officials are “hiding behind the veil of government immunity.”
According to Renz, the emergency use authorizations (EUAs) for the injections help to protect government agencies from accountability for mistakenly reporting adverse reactions and deaths.
Renz added that he believes COVID-19 immunization requirements are “illegal,” and he chastised Republican governors, congressmen, and others for standing by while businesses compelled their employees to take the experimental drug or risk losing their jobs.
“That is complete nonsense,” Renz responded. You have a problem if you’re a conservative thought leader who isn’t talking about individual rights…. In the end, this comes down to self-determination and individual responsibility, which is where we need to be and what America was always designed to be.”