ALEXA’S DAILY RECOMMENDATIONPOLITICSUS

135,000 TEST BALLOTS Thrown Out In Dem Mayoral Primary In NY!

It is breaking news about exposing the fraud!

The NYC Board of Election shared that they counted more than 135,000 ballots that sent the Democrat Mayoral Primary into a frenzy!

The revelation appeared when the frontrunner Dem. Eric Adams was eliminated at two points over Dem. Kathryn Garcia.

Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here: https://t.me/TheTrueDefender

Adams shared statements about the dump of votes and shared that “the vote total just released by the Board of Elections is 100,000-plus more than the total announced on election night” and asked for an explanation from the Board of Elections.

They fixed their error after they sent their statement that shared “the discrepancy in numbers came from the results of the election night results mistakenly being combined with test results that were done before primary day.”

I guess the Dems now decide to report on the realities of the fraud because 135,000 isn’t a number that we should forget.

Eric Adams is now a retired police officer, so that’s why the 135,000 ballots emerged.

CNN covered this story.

The campaign to become New York City’s next mayor has come in for another twist.

On Tuesday, the City Board of Elections released new numbers that suggested Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams’ lead in the Democratic primary had narrowed in the first set of tabulated ranked-choice voting results. Former Sanitation Commissioner Kathryn Garcia, in this preliminary count, had nearly closed the gap, giving Adams a two-point lead.

But within hours of the new figures coming online, the board backtracked — following questions from the Adams campaign and others — and acknowledged a “discrepancy” in its counting process. It subsequently removed the data from its website. Late Tuesday night, the body put out another statement, this time revealing it had mistakenly included 135,000 test vote records in the initial tally. The count will be re-run once the slate is cleared.

“Board staff has removed all test ballot images from the system and will upload election night results, cross-referencing against election night reporting software for verification,” the BOE said through its Twitter account. “The cast vote record will be re-generated and the RCV rounds will be re-tabulated.”

The mess amounted to a realization of many New Yorkers’ well-founded worries over the board’s capacity to competently manage the ranked-choice system, which is making its citywide debut. The BOE has a rotten reputation in the city and is widely regarded as a hub for political patronage jobs. Tuesday’s count was, in itself, a dry run ahead of the final count, which will not take place for weeks, as absentee ballots are cross-checked and, in some cases, cured if voters respond to notices about minor errors.

 

CNBC also shared some details.

This is not how New York City wanted its first foray into ranked-choice voting to go.

After preliminary tabulations from the NYC Board of Elections on Tuesday showed Eric Adams crossing the 50 percent threshold in Round 11 of ranked-choice voting for the Democratic candidate for mayor, there were more questions than answers by the end of the night.

Adams was quick to respond with skepticism toward the result numbers initially posted. He questioned the BOE’s total tally of votes as compared to what was announced on primary night.

“The vote total just released by the Board of Elections is 100,000-plus more than the total announced on election night, raising serious questions. We have asked the Board of Elections to explain such a massive increase and other irregularities before we comment on the Ranked Choice Voting projection,” Adams said in a statement, adding that the campaign is “confident that Eric Adams will be the next mayor of New York.”

About two hours after that announcement was made, the BOE took down the results on their website, which instead stated that the unofficial results would be coming Wednesday. The site later only produced an error message.

Later in the evening, the Board of Elections released a statement clarifying where the discrepancy in numbers came from, saying it was a result of the election night results mistakenly being combined with test results that were done before primary day. The test ballots had not been cleared from the system before the BOE conducted the first round of ranked-choice voting results, the BOE said, which meant an additional 135,000 test ballots had been counted as real ones.

“Board staff has removed all test ballot images from the system and will upload election night results, cross-referencing against election night reporting software for verification. The cast vote record will be re-generated and the RCV rounds will be re-tabulated,” the BOE said, apologizing for the mix-up.

Before the results were taken down, they showed Adams edge former sanitation commissioner Kathryn Garcia by just under 16,000 votes (Adams getting 51.1% of the vote to Garcia’s 48.9%) in the calculations, which were never official or final.

Bear in mind that a Democrat primary found these votes. However, the mainstream media will never share the fraud that happened in the 2020 election, but they reported the fraud that occurred in a mayoral race.

 

Source
CNBCCNNTwitter

Addison Wilson

A passionate teacher in English Language and Literature ready to give her best! Developing and implementing diverse curriculums covering a wide range of subjects. With my problem-solving skills, every job will be easily completed, so punctuation is my strength. Highly skilled at motivating students through positive encouragement and reinforcement of concepts via interactive classroom instruction and observation. My working style fits every personality type, so it makes me a great team player. I have completed numerous journalistic projects successfully, so digging for further information is my field. Fighter for freedom of speech! The truth must be revealed!

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

For continue reading on the site please disable the Ad-block